中国地质大学学报(社会科学版）

回应学生主体性需求是高校创新创业教育质量提升的关键。本研究基于湖北省7所高校1 246名大学生的问卷调查，发现学生群体对创新创业教育具有高认同度，但实际参与呈现低主动性与浅层功利化特征，创新创业教育获得感普遍偏低，其根源在于课堂教学、实践环节、激励导向三个维度均呈现出制度供给与学生内生需求之间的结构性错位。通过对比分析中国人民大学、北京航空航天大学、上海交通大学三种典型实践模式的制度逻辑，借鉴其知识传递、技能训练和激励制度设计的优势并预防局限，整合构建了以满足学生主体性需求为核心的“七位一体”协同育人模式。通过课堂教育、活动引导、竞赛助推、典型引路、基金支持、基地孵化、跟踪服务七大要素协同，实现创新创业教育要素的横向功能互补、纵向递进支撑、内外资源交换，形成覆盖创新创业教育全过程的系统框架，旨在推动创新创业教育从规模供给向高质量赋能转型，为破解制度困境和优化育人生态提供理论依据与实践路径。

Responding to students' need for agency is key to improving the quality of innovation and entrepreneurship education in universities. Based on a questionnaire survey of 1 246 college students from seven universities in Hubei Province, this study found that while students express a high level of recognition for innovation and entrepreneurship education, their actual participation is characterized by low initiative and superficial, utilitarian mindset, resulting in a generally low sense of fulfillment from such education. The root cause lies in a structural mismatch between institutional provision and students' intrinsic needs across three dimensions: classroom instruction, practical training, and incentive mechanisms. Through a comparative analysis of the institutional logic underlying three typical practice models at Renmin University of China, Beihang University, and Shanghai Jiao Tong University, the study draws upon the strengths and limitations of institutional designs focused on knowledge transfer, skills training, and incentives. The study integrates and constructs a “seven-in-one” collaborative education model centered on students' intrinsic needs. Through the synergy of seven key elements, classroom instruction, activity guidance, competition promotion, role model guidance, fund support, incubation bases, and follow-up services, this model achieves horizontal functional complementarity, vertical progressive support, and the exchange of internal and external resources among innovation and entrepreneurship education components, thereby forming a systematic framework covering the entire process of innovation and entrepreneurship education. The model aims to drive the transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship education from “mass provision” to “high-quality empowerment”, providing both a theoretical foundation and practical pathways for resolving institutional challenges and optimizing the educational ecosystem.